For Michael Moore; The Average Canadian Tax Rates

April 27, 2010 at 9:19 pm (Canada, Political) (, , )

Mr. Moore;

Thank you for checking out my blog and my methodology for finding the average Canadian Tax Rate. I cannot get out to LA for a ballgame, but if you have a position on your staff, I need a job.

I am a Michigan boy, too. My dad worked at Buick City and I lived as a young boy in Flushing, MI. I attended Elms Elementary. After my parents divorced and Buick City closed, my family moved to Sterling Heights, MI for Junior High and High School. I attended Wayne State University, where I was a member of the Wayne State Debate team. I have exceptional research training and experience. I was even awarded a grant – as an undergraduate – to research US-Russian nuclear policies.

In 2008, I was employed as an organizer for the President’s campaign.

I believe I would be an asset to your team.

Thank you,
Don Ritchie

Without further ado:

19%-26% (2010) depending on province for the median (2007) individual
22.9%-30.1% (2010) depending on province for the median (2007) family

Canadian Median Individual Income, 2007 – $27,960
http://www40.statcan.gc.ca/l01/cst01/famil105a-eng.htm

Canadian Median Family Income, 2007 – $66,550
http://www40.statcan.gc.ca/l01/cst01/famil108a-eng.htm

For $70k, due to graduated Canadian tax rates, the percentages will be a smidgeon lower; but you changed the criteria after I had already finished my project.

EDIT: Fine, call me a perfectionist. At $70k, the tax rates vary from 22.5% (Nunavut) – 29.8% (Nova Scotia)

5627.6 + 6145.5 = 11773.1 in federal taxes, or 17.7% for the Median Canadian Family

Newfoundland: 2408.4 + 4003.6 + 619.1 = 7031.1 provincial tax, or 10.6%
Prince Edward Island: 3134.4 + 4413.9 + 431 = 7979.3 provincial tax, or 12%
Nova Scotia: 2601 + 4423.7 + 1228.6 = 8253.3 provincial tax, or 12.4%
New Brunswick: 3387.2 + 3766.1 = 7153.3 provincial tax, or 10.7%
Ontario: 1873.9 + 2694.1 = 4568 provincial tax, or 6.9%
Manitoba: 3348 + 4532.7 = 7880.7 provincial tax, or 11.8%
Saskatchewan: 4439 + 3405.5 = 7844.5 provincial tax, or 11.8%
Alberta: 10%
British Columbia: 1814.5 + 2363.2 = 4177.7 provincial tax, or 6.3%
Yukon: 2884.3 + 2476.1 = 5360.4 provincial tax, or 8.1%
Northwest Territories: 2189.3 + 2532.2 = 4721.5 provincial tax, or 7.1%
Nunavut: 1562.6 + 1924 = 3486.6 provincial tax, or 5.2%

2010 Income Tax Rates
http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/tx/ndvdls/fq/txrts-eng.html

15% on the first $40,970 of taxable income, +
22% on the next $40,971 of taxable income (on the portion of taxable income between $40,970 and $81,941), +
26% on the next $45,080 of taxable income (on the portion of taxable income between $81,941 and $127,021), +
29% of taxable income over $127,021.

2010 Provincial Income Tax Rates

Newfoundland and Labrador
7.7% on the first $31,278 of taxable income, +
12.8% on the next $31,278, +
15.5% on the amount over $62,556

Prince Edward Island
9.8% on the first $31,984 of taxable income, +
13.8% on the next $31,985, +
16.7% on the amount over $63,969

Nova Scotia
8.79% on the first $29,590 of taxable income, +
14.95% on the next $29,590, +
16.67% on the next $33,820 +
17.5% on the amount over $93,000

New Brunswick
9.3% on the first $36,421 of taxable income, +
12.5% on the next $36,422, +
13.3% on the next $45,584, +
14.3% on the amount over $118,427

Quebec Contact Revenu Québec

Ontario
5.05% on the first $37,106 of taxable income, +
9.15% on the next $37,108, +
11.16% on the amount over $74,214

Manitoba
10.8% on the first $31,000 of taxable income, +
12.75% on the next $36,000, +
17.4% on the amount over $67,000

Saskatchewan
11% on the first $40,354 of taxable income, +
13% on the next $74,943, +
15% on the amount over $115,297

Alberta
10% of taxable income

British Columbia
5.06% on the first $35,859 of taxable income, +
7.7% on the next $35,860, +
10.5% on the next $10,623, +
12.29% on the next $17,645, +
14.7% on the amount over $99,987

Yukon
7.04% on the first $40,970 of taxable income, +
9.68% on the next $40,971, +
11.44% on the next $45,080, +
12.76% on the amount over $127,021

Northwest Territories
5.9% on the first $37,106 of taxable income, +
8.6% on the next $37,108, +
12.2% on the next $46,442, +
14.05% on the amount over $120,656

Nunavut
4% on the first $39,065 of taxable income, +
7% on the next $39,065, +
9% on the next $48,891, +
11.5% on the amount over $127,021

Permalink 2 Comments

A Glimpse Into GOP Fundraising: Priceless.

March 4, 2010 at 1:29 pm (Political) (, , , , , , , )

Ben Smith at Politico dropped a bombshell about the RNC’s 2010 Fundraising strategy yesterday afternoon.

Manipulating donors with crude caricatures and playing on their fears is hardly unique to Republicans or to the RNC – Democrats raised millions off George W. Bush in similar terms – but rarely is it practiced in such cartoonish terms.

One page, headed “The Evil Empire,” pictures Obama as the Joker from Batman, while House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leaders Harry Reid are depicted as Cruella DeVille and Scooby Doo, respectively.

The document, which two Republican sources said was prepared by the party’s finance staff, comes as Chairman Michael Steele struggles to retain the trust and allegiance of major donors, who can give as much as $30,400 a year to the party.

The small donors who are the targets of direct marketing are described under the heading “Visceral Giving.” Their motivations are listed as “fear;” “Extreme negative feelings toward existing Administration;” and “Reactionary.”

Major donors, by contrast, are treated in a column headed “Calculated Giving.”

Their motivations include: “Peer to Peer Pressure”; “access”; and “Ego-Driven.”

One can understand how these types of tactics can be effective in raising money from a certain type of people. What is not understandable is how the RNC can keep its fundraising message separate from its public campaign message. It is not 1970. These messages turn off a whole lot more people than they appeal to. In an age of cellphone cameras, the old-fashioned wink-wink nod-nod rubber chicken dinner is not isolated from the rest of the world anymore. The Clinton’s learned that in the 2008 primaries.

Chairman Steele’s response illustrates that the right hand does not know what the right-er hand is doing at the RNC.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Women’s Curling Rocks!

February 26, 2010 at 9:23 am (Curling, Olympics, Sports) (, , , )

One of the best parts of the Olympics is exposure to sports that may not be popular in certain parts of the world.

For example, curling!

After beating world champion China, Sweden’s women’s curling team is set to face off for the Gold against top-seeded Canada later this week.

While curling aficionados can no doubt rattle off the many merits of the sport, we here at DRBlog want to focus on some of the other highlights of the sport that should appeal to the casual fan who has no idea why one would take a broom onto ice:

Canada:

Russia:

Japan:

Germany:

Britain:

Norway:

Sweden:

Denmark: (TWINS!)

United States:

This sport has something for everyone!

Last minute update: Here’s to Olympic hotties!

Permalink Leave a Comment

David Margolis aka The Guy Who Stopped Investigating Bush’s Torture

February 20, 2010 at 2:39 pm (Current Events, Political, Terrorism, Torture) (, , , , , , , , , , , , , , )

Associate Deputy Attorney General David Margolis is a 40+ year career attorney at the US Department of Justice, having joined the Justice Department under President Johnson.  ADAG Margolis occupies the senior most career position at the Justice Department.  Everyone above him is a political appointment chosen by the President and the Senate.

Why should you care?

ADAG David Margolis unilaterally decided to overrule the findings of the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility and pardon the authors of President Bush’s infamous “Torture Memos.”

Here is ADAG Margolis’s January 5th memo to the Attorney General where he pardoned the “Torture Memo” authors.  Since you probably are not interested in reading all 70 pages, here are some highlights:

“My task is a narrow one. The OPR report addresses a number of topics without reaching misconduct findings against any Department attorney. I did not review OPR’s analysis of those topics. For example, during the course of its investigation, OPR reviewed prosecutive declinations regarding interrogations of certain detainees, but I have not examined its analysis of those issues…”

“…I do not adopt OPR’s findings of misconduct. This decision should not be viewed as an endorsement of the legal work that underlies those memoranda… [-ed. note: ...because when John Conyers sends them to jail, I don't want to go with them...]

“…I am unpersuaded that OPR has identified such a standard. For this reason and based on the additional analysis set forth below, I cannot adopt OPR’s findings of misconduct, and I will not authorize OPR to refer its findings to the state bar disciplinary authorities in the jurisdictions where Yoo and Bybee are licensed…”

“…While I have declined to adopt OPR’s findings of misconduct, I fear that John Yoo’s loyalty to his own ideology and convictions clouded his view of his obligation to his client and led him to author opinions that reflected his own extreme, albeit sincerely held, view of executive power while speaking for an institutional client…”

ADAG Margolis spent the next 60 pages basically saying, “Since they were trying to prevent another 9/11, it was okay.”

On background, John C. Yoo is a professor of law at UC Berkeley (WTF Berkeley?!) and Jay Bybee is an Appellate Court Judge on the 9th Circuit.  These were the guys that told President Bush it was okay to torture people while they were employed at the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel – aka the authors of the “Torture Memos.”

On February 19th, Rep. John Conyers (D-Michigan), Chair of the House Judiciary Committee, released the Office of Professional Responsibility’s reports, Yoo and Bybee’s refutation, and ADAG Margolis’s memo to public scrutiny.  Both Rep. Conyers and Senator Pat Leahy (D-Vermont), the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, are planning “WTF Is Wrong With You?!” hearings starring ADAG Margolis in the next couple weeks.

Beyond an unelected career bureacrat playing Governor, the worst part of this mess is that Yoo and Bybee were never to be seriously punished for bringing torture to America:  no summary jail sentences in Cuba, no electric anal prods, no waterboarding, no suspension poses, no dogs nipping at their genitals.  The original un-Margolis’d report simply recommended their local bars investigate Yoo and Bybee for misconduct:

“Based on the results of our investigation, we concluded that former AAG Jay S. Bybee and former Deputy AAG John Yoo failed to meet their responsibilities under D.C. Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1 to provide competent representation to their client, the United States, and failed to fulfill their duty to exercise independent legal judgment and to render candid legal advice, pursuant to D.C. Rule of Professional Conduct 2.1. In violating D.C. Rules 1.1 and 2.1, Bybee and Yoo committed professional misconduct. Pursuant to Department policy, we notify their respective state bars of our findings.”

The most severe punishment would have Yoo and Bybee disbarred (and given permanent positions as Legal Correspondents for FoxNEWS).

Here is a real gem from John Yoo in OPR’s final report:

Q. “What about ordering a village of resistants to be massacred? Is that a power that the president could legally—”

A. “Yeah. Although, let me say this. So, certainly that would fall within the Commander-in-Chief’s power over tactical decisions.”

Q. “To order a village of civilians to be [exterminated]?”

A. “Sure.”

What ideology makes war crimes legal?

PS. If anyone has a link to a picture of Margolis, please let me know. Thanks!

Permalink Leave a Comment

Tiger Woods: “Come to Buddha.”

February 19, 2010 at 12:30 pm (Buddhism, Current Events, Golf, Sports, Tiger Woods) (, , , , , )

Tiger Woods ended his three month hiatus from the public eye this morning with a press conference to apologize for his private indiscretions. As most of these athlete/politician/businesspeople follow the typical 6-step formula of 1) apologize to family, 2) apologize to friends and associates, 3) apologize to people who have nothing to do with anything (ie. “fans”), 4) apologize to Jesus, 5) blame the media, 6) vow change; Tiger broke little new ground. However, Tiger’s apology is worth noting for a unique spin: he apologized to Buddha instead of Jesus.

Could Tiger Wood’s indiscretion usher in a new era of pluralism for sports star apologies?

Will we see future athletes take the name of Allah/Vishnu/Joseph Smith/Zarathustra in vain as they try and reconcile their libidos with the soccer mom who controls the remote?

To go directly to Tiger’s new-found religiousity, click here, or fast forward @10 mins here:

I have a lot of work to do, and I intend to dedicate myself to doing it. Part of following this path for me is Buddhism, which my mother taught me at a young age. People probably don’t realize it, but I was raised a Buddhist, and I actively practiced my faith from childhood until I drifted away from it in recent years. Buddhism teaches that a craving for things outside ourselves causes an unhappy and pointless search for security. It teaches me to stop following every impulse and to learn restraint. Obviously, I lost track of what I was taught.

Unfortunately, the enemies of athletes’ “Come To Pluralism” have already begun rallying around the Cross. Brit Hume, the FoxNEWS anchor renowned for his Fair-and-Balanced coverage of current events, uncharacteristically leapt to the defense of a more traditional brand of idolatry:

Thank goodness Bill Kristol was able to boil down the issues to what really matters.

Permalink Leave a Comment

The Full Text of Joe Stack’s (the 2/18/10 Austin Plane Bomber) Suicide Note

February 18, 2010 at 2:56 pm (Current Events, Political, Terrorism, Texas) (, , , , , )

The FBI’s already taken down the original letter from embeddedart.com, which unnerved me a little.

Here’s the WaPo’s copy of the original.

I’m preserving this for the sake of history. This guy isn’t a hero. He shouldn’t be idolized. He’s a terrorist – and as news unfolds – probably a murderer.

But after 9/11 the first question I thought was, “Why?”

This guy doesn’t seem like a kook. I’m sure the veracity of events in this letter are going to be contested in the future and this guy is going to be the focus of months of macabre cable news and talk radio discussion. I pray others do not emulate this guy.

But there are 300 million Americans. Lots of them feel like this guy. With hundreds of people screaming at their elected representatives at innocuous health care meetings, a mass media and a political class profitting from feeding the flames of this mindless rage building across the country – it feels like the Republic is reaching an unknown boiling point.

Someone in charge needs to step back and ask: What makes otherwise normal people like Timothy McVeigh or Joe Stack do these things?

If you’re reading this, you’re no doubt asking yourself, “Why did this have to happen?” The simple truth is that it is complicated and has been coming for a long time. The writing process, started many months ago, was intended to be therapy in the face of the looming realization that there isn’t enough therapy in the world that can fix what is really broken. Needless to say, this rant could fill volumes with example after example if I would let it. I find the process of writing it frustrating, tedious, and probably pointless… especially given my gross inability to gracefully articulate my thoughts in light of the storm raging in my head. Exactly what is therapeutic about that I’m not sure, but desperate times call for desperate measures.

We are all taught as children that without laws there would be no society, only anarchy. Sadly, starting at early ages we in this country have been brainwashed to believe that, in return for our dedication and service, our government stands for justice for all. We are further brainwashed to believe that there is freedom in this place, and that we should be ready to lay our lives down for the noble principals represented by its founding fathers. Remember? One of these was “no taxation without representation”. I have spent the total years of my adulthood unlearning that crap from only a few years of my childhood. These days anyone who really stands up for that principal is promptly labeled a “crackpot”, traitor and worse.

While very few working people would say they haven’t had their fair share of taxes (as can I), in my lifetime I can say with a great degree of certainty that there has never been a politician cast a vote on any matter with the likes of me or my interests in mind. Nor, for that matter, are they the least bit interested in me or anything I have to say.

Why is it that a handful of thugs and plunderers can commit unthinkable atrocities (and in the case of the GM executives, for scores of years) and when it’s time for their gravy train to crash under the weight of their gluttony and overwhelming stupidity, the force of the full federal government has no difficulty coming to their aid within days if not hours? Yet at the same time, the joke we call the American medical system, including the drug and insurance companies, are murdering tens of thousands of people a year and stealing from the corpses and victims they cripple, and this country’s leaders don’t see this as important as bailing out a few of their vile, rich cronies. Yet, the political “representatives” (thieves, liars, and self-serving scumbags is far more accurate) have endless time to sit around for year after year and debate the state of the “terrible health care problem”. It’s clear they see no crisis as long as the dead people don’t get in the way of their corporate profits rolling in.

And justice? You’ve got to be kidding!

How can any rational individual explain that white elephant conundrum in the middle of our tax system and, indeed, our entire legal system? Here we have a system that is, by far, too complicated for the brightest of the master scholars to understand. Yet, it mercilessly “holds accountable” its victims, claiming that they’re responsible for fully complying with laws not even the experts understand. The law “requires” a signature on the bottom of a tax filing; yet no one can say truthfully that they understand what they are signing; if that’s not “duress” than what is. If this is not the measure of a totalitarian regime, nothing is.

How did I get here?

My introduction to the real American nightmare starts back in the early ‘80s. Unfortunately after more than 16 years of school, somewhere along the line I picked up the absurd, pompous notion that I could read and understand plain English. Some friends introduced me to a group of people who were having ‘tax code’ readings and discussions. In particular, zeroed in on a section relating to the wonderful “exemptions” that make institutions like the vulgar, corrupt Catholic Church so incredibly wealthy. We carefully studied the law (with the help of some of the “best”, high-paid, experienced tax lawyers in the business), and then began to do exactly what the “big boys” were doing (except that we weren’t steeling from our congregation or lying to the government about our massive profits in the name of God). We took a great deal of care to make it all visible, following all of the rules, exactly the way the law said it was to be done.

The intent of this exercise and our efforts was to bring about a much-needed re-evaluation of the laws that allow the monsters of organized religion to make such a mockery of people who earn an honest living. However, this is where I learned that there are two “interpretations” for every law; one for the very rich, and one for the rest of us… Oh, and the monsters are the very ones making and enforcing the laws; the inquisition is still alive and well today in this country.

That little lesson in patriotism cost me $40,000+, 10 years of my life, and set my retirement plans back to 0. It made me realize for the first time that I live in a country with an ideology that is based on a total and complete lie. It also made me realize, not only how naive I had been, but also the incredible stupidity of the American public; that they buy, hook, line, and sinker, the crap about their “freedom”… and that they continue to do so with eyes closed in the face of overwhelming evidence and all that keeps happening in front of them.

Before even having to make a shaky recovery from the sting of the first lesson on what justice really means in this country (around 1984 after making my way through engineering school and still another five years of “paying my dues”), I felt I finally had to take a chance of launching my dream of becoming an independent engineer.

On the subjects of engineers and dreams of independence, I should digress somewhat to say that I’m sure that I inherited the fascination for creative problem solving from my father. I realized this at a very young age.

The significance of independence, however, came much later during my early years of college; at the age of 18 or 19 when I was living on my own as student in an apartment in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. My neighbor was an elderly retired woman (80+ seemed ancient to me at that age) who was the widowed wife of a retired steel worker. Her husband had worked all his life in the steel mills of central Pennsylvania with promises from big business and the union that, for his 30 years of service, he would have a pension and medical care to look forward to in his retirement. Instead he was one of the thousands who got nothing because the incompetent mill management and corrupt union (not to mention the government) raided their pension funds and stole their retirement. All she had was social security to live on.

In retrospect, the situation was laughable because here I was living on peanut butter and bread (or Ritz crackers when I could afford to splurge) for months at a time. When I got to know this poor figure and heard her story I felt worse for her plight than for my own (I, after all, I thought I had everything to in front of me). I was genuinely appalled at one point, as we exchanged stories and commiserated with each other over our situations, when she in her grandmotherly fashion tried to convince me that I would be “healthier” eating cat food (like her) rather than trying to get all my substance from peanut butter and bread. I couldn’t quite go there, but the impression was made. I decided that I didn’t trust big business to take care of me, and that I would take responsibility for my own future and myself.

Return to the early ‘80s, and here I was off to a terrifying start as a ‘wet-behind-the-ears’ contract software engineer… and two years later, thanks to the fine backroom, midnight effort by the sleazy executives of Arthur Andersen (the very same folks who later brought us Enron and other such calamities) and an equally sleazy New York Senator (Patrick Moynihan), we saw the passage of 1986 tax reform act with its section 1706.

For you who are unfamiliar, here is the core text of the IRS Section 1706, defining the treatment of workers (such as contract engineers) for tax purposes. Visit this link for a conference committee report (http://www.synergistech.com/1706.shtml#ConferenceCommitteeReport) regarding the intended interpretation of Section 1706 and the relevant parts of Section 530, as amended. For information on how these laws affect technical services workers and their clients, read our discussion here (http://www.synergistech.com/ic-taxlaw.shtml).

SEC. 1706. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TECHNICAL PERSONNEL.

(a) IN GENERAL – Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:

(d) EXCEPTION. – This section shall not apply in the case of an individual who pursuant to an arrangement between the taxpayer and another person, provides services for such other person as an engineer, designer, drafter, computer programmer, systems analyst, or other similarly skilled worker engaged in a similar line of work.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE. – The amendment made by this section shall apply to remuneration paid and services rendered after December 31, 1986.

Note:

“another person” is the client in the traditional job-shop relationship.
“taxpayer” is the recruiter, broker, agency, or job shop.
“individual”, “employee”, or “worker” is you.
Admittedly, you need to read the treatment to understand what it is saying but it’s not very complicated. The bottom line is that they may as well have put my name right in the text of section (d). Moreover, they could only have been more blunt if they would have came out and directly declared me a criminal and non-citizen slave. Twenty years later, I still can’t believe my eyes.

During 1987, I spent close to $5000 of my ‘pocket change’, and at least 1000 hours of my time writing, printing, and mailing to any senator, congressman, governor, or slug that might listen; none did, and they universally treated me as if I was wasting their time. I spent countless hours on the L.A. freeways driving to meetings and any and all of the disorganized professional groups who were attempting to mount a campaign against this atrocity. This, only to discover that our efforts were being easily derailed by a few moles from the brokers who were just beginning to enjoy the windfall from the new declaration of their “freedom”. Oh, and don’t forget, for all of the time I was spending on this, I was loosing income that I couldn’t bill clients.

After months of struggling it had clearly gotten to be a futile exercise. The best we could get for all of our trouble is a pronouncement from an IRS mouthpiece that they weren’t going to enforce that provision (read harass engineers and scientists). This immediately proved to be a lie, and the mere existence of the regulation began to have its impact on my bottom line; this, of course, was the intended effect.

Again, rewind my retirement plans back to 0 and shift them into idle. If I had any sense, I clearly should have left abandoned engineering and never looked back.

Instead I got busy working 100-hour workweeks. Then came the L.A. depression of the early 1990s. Our leaders decided that they didn’t need the all of those extra Air Force bases they had in Southern California, so they were closed; just like that. The result was economic devastation in the region that rivaled the widely publicized Texas S&L fiasco. However, because the government caused it, no one gave a shit about all of the young families who lost their homes or street after street of boarded up houses abandoned to the wealthy loan companies who received government funds to “shore up” their windfall. Again, I lost my retirement.

Years later, after weathering a divorce and the constant struggle trying to build some momentum with my business, I find myself once again beginning to finally pick up some speed. Then came the .COM bust and the 911 nightmare. Our leaders decided that all aircraft were grounded for what seemed like an eternity; and long after that, ‘special’ facilities like San Francisco were on security alert for months. This made access to my customers prohibitively expensive. Ironically, after what they had done the Government came to the aid of the airlines with billions of our tax dollars … as usual they left me to rot and die while they bailed out their rich, incompetent cronies WITH MY MONEY! After these events, there went my business but not quite yet all of my retirement and savings.

By this time, I’m thinking that it might be good for a change. Bye to California, I’ll try Austin for a while. So I moved, only to find out that this is a place with a highly inflated sense of self-importance and where damn little real engineering work is done. I’ve never experienced such a hard time finding work. The rates are 1/3 of what I was earning before the crash, because pay rates here are fixed by the three or four large companies in the area who are in collusion to drive down prices and wages… and this happens because the justice department is all on the take and doesn’t give a fuck about serving anyone or anything but themselves and their rich buddies.

To survive, I was forced to cannibalize my savings and retirement, the last of which was a small IRA. This came in a year with mammoth expenses and not a single dollar of income. I filed no return that year thinking that because I didn’t have any income there was no need. The sleazy government decided that they disagreed. But they didn’t notify me in time for me to launch a legal objection so when I attempted to get a protest filed with the court I was told I was no longer entitled to due process because the time to file ran out. Bend over for another $10,000 helping of justice.

So now we come to the present. After my experience with the CPA world, following the business crash I swore that I’d never enter another accountant’s office again. But here I am with a new marriage and a boatload of undocumented income, not to mention an expensive new business asset, a piano, which I had no idea how to handle. After considerable thought I decided that it would be irresponsible NOT to get professional help; a very big mistake.

When we received the forms back I was very optimistic that they were in order. I had taken all of the years information to Bill Ross, and he came back with results very similar to what I was expecting. Except that he had neglected to include the contents of Sheryl’s unreported income; $12,700 worth of it. To make matters worse, Ross knew all along this was missing and I didn’t have a clue until he pointed it out in the middle of the audit. By that time it had become brutally evident that he was representing himself and not me.

This left me stuck in the middle of this disaster trying to defend transactions that have no relationship to anything tax-related (at least the tax-related transactions were poorly documented). Things I never knew anything about and things my wife had no clue would ever matter to anyone. The end result is… well, just look around.

I remember reading about the stock market crash before the “great” depression and how there were wealthy bankers and businessmen jumping out of windows when they realized they screwed up and lost everything. Isn’t it ironic how far we’ve come in 60 years in this country that they now know how to fix that little economic problem; they just steal from the middle class (who doesn’t have any say in it, elections are a joke) to cover their asses and it’s “business-as-usual”. Now when the wealthy fuck up, the poor get to die for the mistakes… isn’t that a clever, tidy solution.

As government agencies go, the FAA is often justifiably referred to as a tombstone agency, though they are hardly alone. The recent presidential puppet GW Bush and his cronies in their eight years certainly reinforced for all of us that this criticism rings equally true for all of the government. Nothing changes unless there is a body count (unless it is in the interest of the wealthy sows at the government trough). In a government full of hypocrites from top to bottom, life is as cheap as their lies and their self-serving laws.

I know I’m hardly the first one to decide I have had all I can stand. It has always been a myth that people have stopped dying for their freedom in this country, and it isn’t limited to the blacks, and poor immigrants. I know there have been countless before me and there are sure to be as many after. But I also know that by not adding my body to the count, I insure nothing will change. I choose to not keep looking over my shoulder at “big brother” while he strips my carcass, I choose not to ignore what is going on all around me, I choose not to pretend that business as usual won’t continue; I have just had enough.

I can only hope that the numbers quickly get too big to be white washed and ignored that the American zombies wake up and revolt; it will take nothing less. I would only hope that by striking a nerve that stimulates the inevitable double standard, knee-jerk government reaction that results in more stupid draconian restrictions people wake up and begin to see the pompous political thugs and their mindless minions for what they are. Sadly, though I spent my entire life trying to believe it wasn’t so, but violence not only is the answer, it is the only answer. The cruel joke is that the really big chunks of shit at the top have known this all along and have been laughing, at and using this awareness against, fools like me all along.

I saw it written once that the definition of insanity is repeating the same process over and over and expecting the outcome to suddenly be different. I am finally ready to stop this insanity. Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well.

The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.

Joe Stack (1956-2010)
02/18/2010

Permalink Leave a Comment

Marco Rubio Hates Cuban Immigrants!

February 18, 2010 at 12:21 pm (Florida, Political) (, , , , , , , , , )

Florida House Speaker Marco Rubio, a first generation son of Cuban immigrants, is the darling of the Tea Party as he challenges Florida Governor Charlie Crist for the Republican nomination for Florida’s open US Senate seat. Here’s an excerpt of Rubio’s opening address to the Conservative Politcal Action Conference this morning:

“I was not born to a wealthy or connected family. And yet, I have never felt or been limited by the circumstances of my birth. I have never once felt like there was something that was not possible for me because of who my parents were, or where they came from. But why is it that I have been able to accomplish many of my dreams, but my grandfather’s dreams never had a chance? The answer is simple. Because I am privileged. The simple privilege of being a citizen of the greatest society in all of human history. There has never been a nation like the United States.”

“People want leaders that will come here to Washington D.C. and stand up to this big government agenda, not be co-opted by it. The Senate already has one Arlen Specter too many. And America already has a Democrat party. It doesn’t need another Democrat party.”

Mister Rubio, your mother’s foodstamps allowed you to attend school with a full belly and a bright mind. Businesses’ and wealthier Miami landowners’ taxes paid for your excellent public education. When you got sick, Medicaid allowed your mother to take you to the doctor. Federal student aid allowed you to attain multiple advanced degrees at public universities.

Fine, you are a conservative Republican. No one in America would deny you your personal beliefs. But why join the Tea Party?

Why would you build a personal power base from people who would deny the same opportunities to the next generation of immigrants’ children?

Permalink Leave a Comment

Quest for the Paczki in Rural Louisiana

February 11, 2010 at 9:45 am (Current Events, Mardi Gras) (, )

A humorous conversation with my local baker in a small town in the backwoods of Louisiana:

Me, “Excuse me, Miss Bakery lady. May I buy a paczki?”

Baker, “Whu’s a punchkey?”

Me, “Nevermind. Is there a polish bakery in Shreveport?”

Baker, “Is dat a Yankee word for stripper?”

Me, “No. No. Poland’s a country. Hitler invaded it at the beginning of World War II.”

Baker, “You dun wanna go to no colored bakery. Dey ain’t a safe part of Shreveport to go to.”

Me, “No. No. Polish people are very white. Their name’s end in –ski and never have enough vowels in the middle. The old Pope was Polish.”

Baker, “Git out! We dun wanna no Catlicks in our god-fearing bakery! You go rot in Hell with yer Pope and yer punchkeys!”

Me, “Thank you ma’am. Enjoy your… uhhh… Mardi Gras.”

So concluded my quest last year. Will this year’s quest end with similar failure?

PS. SAINTS RULE!!!!!!

Permalink Leave a Comment

Arithmetic Could Damn the Democratic Party in 2010

January 20, 2010 at 3:09 pm (Political) (, , , , , , , , , )

15.3 million Americans are officially unemployed.

In the wake of Tuesday’s Massachusetts special Senate election, politicians and pundits are tearing at their clothes trying to figure out the “why’s” and “how’s” of Senator-Elect Brown’s surprise victory. The Washington Post today, alone, has 17 pundits with 17 explanations and 17 solutions. While President Clinton roams the hallways of the Hart Building warning anyone who will listen about the electoral dangers of dropping health care reform from the agenda, Congress would be wise to heed the words of a younger candidate Clinton, “It’s the economy, stupid.”

Last year’s $787 billion stimulus package would have paid the wages of 17.5 million workers at the American median wage for one year. Americans can do arithmetic.

There is no doubt to an objective observer that – despite the pork and the goofy pet projects – the stimulus worked as intended. The middle-class tax cuts eased families struggling with increased household expenses and stagnant wages. The Dow is up 3000 points from this time last year. Unemployment leveled off (at a slightly higher percentage than the White House had bet – whoever decided to announce a number should be the first staffer standing in a soup line). Wall Street bonuses are more self-indulgent than ever. No doubt, this time next year, everything will be just fine. Eventually, millions of permanent private-sector jobs will flourish from the foundations of the stimulus package.

Would a member of Congress want to cross their fingers and hope that everything is fine by the time November rolls around?

Before every coward from a swing state in the House revolts, the Democratic leadership needs to take swift, decisive action to reassure the caucus if they hope to accomplish ANYTHING this year: reinstate the Works Progress Administration. Spend $200 billion and employ 4 million people, immediately. Reserve half the money to target swing districts. If the Democrat needs 10,000 votes, create 20,000 jobs. Put a donkey in the corner of the paycheck. Get the caucus back in order, pass something, call it “health care reform”, and declare victory. Get healthcare OFF the radar immediately and censure any member of the caucus that opens their mouth in front of a camera without including in every sentence the word, “Jobs.”

This trick is Tammany Hall 101 and as old as Julius Caesar.

Why? It works. Modern politics is not above this. President Bush wrote every American a $350 check in 2003 and was handily re-elected in 2004. The Republicans already telegraphed their strategy to this tactic with last year’s stimulus debate. Democrats already won the “tax cuts hurt us” argument in 2008 and should build off of that in 2010. Let the Republicans scream for a year about make-work. Every time a Republican slanders make-work and suggests tax cuts, the Democrat should tout their own middle-class tax cut and talk about “Main Street vs. Wall Street.” Democrats should define their make-work project NOW as “Main Street” and the voter will fill out the meme as to who backs “Wall Street” (hint: it’s the guy who starts every sentence with the words, “tax cut”).

A Republican cannot ride a populist tiger when they are kicking it in the chops.

If Massachusetts taught us anything, there is no safe district in 2010. As the party in power, the Democrats must define themselves before they are defined by their opponents. The only way a party in power can define themselves is through their work. Every Democrat can scream, “Jobs!” on every street corner; but if the economy has not turned around by November, no voter is going to agree that tax cuts, regulatory incentives, or targeted small-business loans were sufficient to warrant re-electing their first or second term Democratic member of Congress. A WPA program will, as history has proven, have little to no practical effect on the economy as a whole, but it is something tangible a candidate in 2010 can point to if this recovery proves more sluggish than anticipated. Better, a WPA program allows a Democrat to define themselves as “Main Street” before their opponent has the opportunity to define them as “Wall Street.”

Permalink Leave a Comment

You Should Buy Chairman Mike’s Lil 12-step Book!

January 16, 2010 at 7:08 pm (Political) (, , , , , , , , )

Apparently, no one inside the GOP knew that Chairman Michael Steele was writing a book.  They sure did not appreciate him publicly deriding his party’s chances of reclaiming a chamber of Congress this fall.

Chairman Mike, “Fire me.  But until then, shut up.”

Of course, the folks who are in charge of hiring/firing Chairman Mike are soon to be taken on vacation to Hawaii, on the RNC dime, courtesy of Chairman Mike.  Mind you, these folks have tremendous influence and are very important to fundraising and mobilizing the grassroots to get candidates elected, but they have no actual political power.  These are EXACTLY the type of self-important people that will wilt under the fancy wine and dine.

Better yet, Chairman Mike has got the street-cred to back up his mouth.  The GOP won more than it lost in special elections last year and raised $84 million in an off-year.  Of course, Chairman Mike blew $90 million on silly local projects that reinforced his support amongst the GOP base while flipping the bird at the Beltway GOP.  Chairman Mike spent so much money that the RNC changed their spending rules and took away Chairman Mike’s RNC credit card.

So, going into a midterm where the GOP has their best shot since 1994 and after an amazing off-year fundraising spree, the RNC has a whopping $8 million in the bank.

Chairman Mike is a walking Guinness commercial, “BRILLIANT!”

All the while, on top of his $224,000 RNC salary, the GOP found out this week that Chairman Mike has been charging $20k a pop for speaking appearances and a PR firm independent of the RNC was setting them up for him.

If they were playing Halo, Chairman Mike would be screaming, “OWNED!” over a headset while his avatar squatted on the head of the GOP’s avatar’s corpse.

Chairman Mike’s manifesto must be revenge for Chip Saltsman’s Christmas card the year before last.  A man of Chairman Mike’s chutzpah deserves reward:  buy his book.  And, Chairman Mike, take ‘em all the way to the bank!

Permalink Leave a Comment

Next page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.